PhD Science - Level K Module 2: Pushes and Pulls (Tugboats Moving Cargo Ships)

PhD Science · K-2
✕ Not Recommended Shallow by Default

PhD Science LK M2 (Kindergarten, Pushes and Pulls/Tugboats) - ✕ Not Recommended (Type 6 Clean-but-Empty). Foundation 0% under strict atomic-foundation scoring; 100% gap, 0 map errors, 0 FSEs. Four-lesson Engineering Challenge (cushion for tugboat to stop close to dock). Practices 100% green.

Foundation Score
0%
Shallow
Gap: 100% · Map errors: 0 (×3 = 0 pts)
What-Why Gap
100%
Full gap - atoms/molecules never introduced before explanations expected
Map Errors
0%
No ontological mismatches detected
Factual Errors
0
No factual errors detected.
Practices
100%
Deep
Students engage in genuine scientific practices at a developmentally appropriate level across the unit. Reported, and does not affect the verdict.
Program Information
ProgramPhD Science
UnitLevel K Module 2: Pushes and Pulls (Tugboats Moving Cargo Ships)
PublisherGreat Minds PBC
AuthorGreat Minds PBC
Grade BandKindergarten (K-2)
NGSS AlignmentK-PS2-1, K-PS2-2, K-2-ETS1-1 (DCIs: PS2.A Forces and Motion, PS2.B Types of Interactions, ETS1.A)

Verdict and Foundation - Type 6 Clean-but-Empty

Verdict: ✕ Not Recommended (atomic-molecular foundations). Foundation_calc 0.0%, shallow tier. Practices 100% green. Zero map errors. Zero confirmed FSEs.

Strict atomic-foundation scoring applied. Across 23 lessons of pushes, pulls, motion, direction change, and engineering design, atoms/molecules/particles do not appear - appropriate scope for a Kindergarten forces unit. The unit treats forces macroscopically (pushes and pulls cause objects to start moving; strength affects speed; pushes and pulls cause changing direction or stopping).

What Students Learn

Anchored on tugboats moving cargo ships in a harbor. Essential Question: How do tugboats move cargo ships through a harbor?

Concept 1 (L1-9) - Starting Movement: Tugboat anchor model (L1-3); categorize pushes/pulls (L4-6); stronger/weaker pushes and pulls (L7-8); skateboard race conceptual checkpoint (L9). Knowledge: Pushes and pulls can cause objects to start moving; strength affects speed.

Concept 2 (L10-16) - Changing Movement: Plan and investigate how tugboats turn a cargo ship (L10-12); plan and investigate slowing down and stopping (L13-15); simultaneous pushes between paired objects (L15); soccer conceptual checkpoint (L16). Knowledge: Pushes and pulls can cause moving objects to change direction or stop.

Engineering Challenge (L17-20): How can we help a tugboat stop close to a dock? Students design a model cushion. K-2-ETS1-1 four-lesson design cycle.

Application (L21-23): Socratic Seminar (L21). EOM carnival-games application (L22). Debrief (L23).

Key Evidence

"Pushes and pulls can cause objects to start moving. The strength of the pushes and pulls can affect the speed of the objects." (Concept 1 Knowledge Statement) - K-PS2-1 implementation.

"Pushes and pulls can cause moving objects to change direction or stop." (Concept 2 Knowledge Statement) - K-PS2-1 implementation.

"How can we help a tugboat stop close to a dock?" (Engineering Challenge L17-20) - K-2-ETS1-1 design problem.

L15 identifies simultaneous pushes between a pair of objects - Newton's-3rd-Law-like concept at Kindergarten level.

FSE Review

FSE_CONFIRMED: 0. Physics correct at Kindergarten level: pushes and pulls cause objects to start, stop, or change direction; strength affects speed; simultaneous pushes between paired objects. Tugboat-and-cargo-ship phenomenon accurately framed.

Map Errors

Map errors: 0. No OAO error at Kindergarten-appropriate macroscopic pushes/pulls framing.

Practices

Practices: 100% green. Five of seven NGSS practices INTENTIONALLY_DEVELOPED. Driving Question Board built L3. Tugboat anchor model built L2 and revised across module. L7-8 stronger/weaker push-pull investigations. L10-15 plan-and-carry-out investigations (turning, slowing, stopping). Four-lesson Engineering Challenge L17-20 (cushion design). L21 Socratic Seminar at Kindergarten. L22 EOM carnival-games application.

What Would Change This Verdict

For Foundation: under strict scoring, the categorical change available is introducing atomic content - the design choice PhD Science explicitly defers to higher grades.

For practices: nothing - 100% is the maximum.

Pattern Note

Type 6: Clean-but-Empty. Same nominal Foundation as the OSE K-2 Elementary programs reviewed under strict scoring. Within PhD Science K-2 programs reviewed, LK M1 + LK M2 (this) + L1 M2 + L1 M3 + L2 M1 all share 0% Foundation under strict scoring.

Scoring Detail
Total Passages Scored30
Raw Gap Error100.0% (9/9 mechanism passages - no atoms/molecules/particles named anywhere in unit)
FALSE = atoms/molecules not present before students are asked to explain. The student is navigating without a starting point.
Adjusted Gap Error100.0% (9/9 UNSCAFFOLDED - atomic theory not introduced)
UNSCAFFOLDED = no atomic grounding at all. LESSON_ATOMS = atoms mentioned elsewhere in lesson but not connected to this concept.
Substance-Model Errors (REI)0
Curriculum treats a process or outcome as a substance - "heat flows," "energy is stored," "electricity flows like water." Student builds a substance ontology.
Label-as-Explanation (LAE)0
Curriculum provides a name and treats it as an explanation - "this happens because of gravity." Student believes knowing the name IS understanding the concept.
Vague-Entity Errors (AEC)0
Curriculum uses vague entities ("tiny particles," "building blocks") without specifying atoms or molecules. Student invents their own model with macroscopic properties.
Factual Science Errors (FSE)0
Statements that are scientifically incorrect - not imprecise framing, but wrong. Any confirmed FSE = Not Recommended.
Practices100% - Deep
Seven practices scored PRESENT, PARTIAL, or ABSENT and averaged: asking questions, developing and using models, planning and carrying out investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, using mathematics, constructing explanations and designing solutions, and argument from evidence. Higher is better, the opposite direction from gap and map errors. Reported but not part of the Foundation Score or the verdict.
Curriculum-Wide Finding

Type 6 Clean-but-Empty under strict atomic-foundation scoring. Kindergarten forces unit anchored on tugboats moving cargo ships. Four-lesson Engineering Challenge implements K-2-ETS1-1 (cushion to help tugboat stop close to dock). L15 introduces simultaneous pushes between paired objects (Newton's-3rd-Law-like concept at Kindergarten level).

Bright Spots

23-lesson Tugboat anchor model with iterative revision. Four-lesson Engineering Challenge (cushion to help tugboat stop close to dock). L15 simultaneous pushes concept at Kindergarten. Socratic Seminar at Kindergarten (L21). Carnival-games EOM application (L22).

Depth Classification

Not Recommended (Type 6 Clean-but-Empty - atomic theory absent at Kindergarten) - All 9 mechanism passages UNSCAFFOLDED. PhD Science design philosophy: defer atomic mechanism to higher grades. Engineering Challenge with K-2-ETS1-1 implementation. Tugboat anchor model with iterative revision across module.

Unit note: Scores represent the evaluated unit only. Other units in this program may score differently. The depth label (Shallow) describes this unit's structural relationship to causal mechanism - the detail above explains whether that structure reflects deliberate design, inherited convention, or other factors.

Evidence and data

Evidence for every entry is published at three levels. Each level states what it contains and what it leaves out.

1On this page

Scores, verdict, and the full pattern count for this unit are above: adjusted gap, REI / LAE / AEC counts, FSE status, and the seven-practice score. Passage-level detail for this unit is carried in the downloadable evidence file.

2Download the evidence

This file covers the unit scored on this page.

Excel (.xlsx)CSV14 passages · 8 KB
How these passages were selected. This is a curated subset, not the full evidence table. The selection rule is fixed: 8 to 12 passages chosen to illustrate every pattern the pipeline found in this unit, including the patterns that count in the program's favor. Where a pattern appears many times, one representative instance is included and the full count is reported on this page rather than reproduced in the file. Passages are quoted verbatim and identified by location so any claim can be checked against the source. The full evidence table is not posted publicly because it would reproduce a substantial portion of a copyrighted work; it is available under tier 3 below.
3The full dataset

The complete classified evidence table for this unit, every extracted passage with its classification, is available to researchers, journalists, and to the publisher of the program being scored. This is a standing offer with no conditions attached and no agreement to sign.

If you think a score is wrong, say so. Challenges and our responses to them are published on the evidence and challenges page, including the ones we lose.

← Back to Science Ed Ledger

Request a Review

Have a curriculum, kit, or program you'd like us to review? Drop us a note, tell us what you want to see, we'll test it and post the results.