PhD Science - Level 1 Module 2: Light (Wayang Shadow Puppetry)

PhD Science · K-2
✕ Not Recommended Shallow by Default

PhD Science L1 M2 (Grade 1, Light/Wayang) - ✕ Not Recommended (Type 6 Clean-but-Empty). Foundation 0% under strict atomic-foundation scoring; 100% gap, 0 map errors, 0 FSEs. Cross-grade scope discipline documented (reflection deferred to Grade 4 Module 4; transparent/translucent/opaque terms avoided at K-2). Sustained 24-lesson anchor-model revision. Practices 100% green.

Foundation Score
0%
Shallow
Gap: 100% · Map errors: 0 (×3 = 0 pts)
What-Why Gap
100%
Full gap - atoms/molecules never introduced before explanations expected
Map Errors
0%
No ontological mismatches detected
Factual Errors
0
No factual errors detected.
Practices
100%
Deep
Students engage in genuine scientific practices at a developmentally appropriate level across the unit. Reported, and does not affect the verdict.
Program Information
ProgramPhD Science
UnitLevel 1 Module 2: Light (Wayang Shadow Puppetry)
PublisherGreat Minds PBC
AuthorGreat Minds PBC
Grade BandGrade 1 (K-2)
NGSS Alignment1-PS4-2, 1-PS4-3 (DCI: PS4.B Electromagnetic Radiation, K-2 band)

Verdict and Foundation - Type 6 Clean-but-Empty

Verdict: ✕ Not Recommended (atomic-molecular foundations). Foundation_calc 0.0%, shallow tier. Practices 100% green. Zero map errors. Zero confirmed FSEs.

Strict atomic-foundation scoring applied. Across 24 lessons of light, shadow, mirrors, and materials investigation, atoms/molecules/photons do not appear - appropriate scope for a Grade 1 light unit. The Teacher Edition documents cross-grade scope discipline: reflection deferred to Level 4 Module 4 ("students gather evidence to learn that light travels in rays and that all objects reflect light"); transparent/translucent/opaque terms avoided at K-2 with documented pedagogical reasoning (the scattering distinction is not yet meaningful at the grade).

What Students Learn

Anchored on wayang shadow puppetry from Indonesia. Essential Question: How do puppeteers use light to tell stories during wayang shows?

Concept 1 (L1-9) - Sight: Shadows in sunny places. Read Blackout (Rocco 2011). Knowledge: Objects are visible when light illuminates them or when they give off their own light (1-PS4-2). Glowworm cave application.

Concept 2 (L10-14) - Interactions with Light: Three parts of a shadow. L11 order-of-parts six-station investigation. Mirrors redirect light - Rjukan, Norway engineers.

Science Challenge (L15-18): Test seven materials with light meters for wayang screen. Knowledge: Different materials allow no light, some light, or all light to travel through them (1-PS4-3).

L19-20: Holes in objects → holes in shadows. Mirror redirects light onto puppet.

Application (L21-23): Socratic Seminar (L21). EOM Lighthouse Assessment (L22).

Key Evidence

"The term reflection is used in Level 4 Module 4, when students gather evidence to learn that light travels in rays and that all objects reflect light." (TE Module Overview) - Cross-grade scope discipline documented.

"PhD Science avoids these terms [transparent, translucent, opaque] because the difference in the amount of light that travels through translucent and transparent materials is not always significant." (TE Module Overview) - Pedagogical reasoning for term deferral.

"Objects are visible when light illuminates them or when they give off their own light." (L7) - 1-PS4-2 implementation.

FSE Review

FSE_CONFIRMED: 0. Physics correct at Grade 1 level.

Map Errors

Map errors: 0. Standard NGSS K-2 light-as-mover phrasing classified as standard scientific terminology (context override). No AEC - PhD Science does not use "particles" framing at K-2.

Practices

Practices: 100% green. All seven NGSS practices INTENTIONALLY_DEVELOPED. Sustained anchor-model revision across 24 lessons. Science Challenge L15-18 embedded engineering design. Cross-cultural framing (Indonesian wayang + Norwegian Rjukan + lighthouse). Socratic Seminar at Grade 1. Driving Question Board.

What Would Change This Verdict

For Foundation: under strict scoring, the categorical change available is introducing atomic content - the design choice PhD Science explicitly defers to higher grades.

For practices: nothing - 100% is the maximum.

Pattern Note

Type 6: Clean-but-Empty. Same nominal Foundation as the OSE K-2 Elementary programs reviewed under strict scoring. Within PhD Science K-2 programs reviewed, LK M1 + L1 M2 (this) + L1 M3 + L2 M1 all share 0% Foundation with documented cross-grade staging.

Scoring Detail
Total Passages Scored30
Raw Gap Error100.0% (18/18 mechanism passages - no atoms/molecules/photons named anywhere in unit)
FALSE = atoms/molecules not present before students are asked to explain. The student is navigating without a starting point.
Adjusted Gap Error100.0% (18/18 UNSCAFFOLDED - atomic theory not introduced)
UNSCAFFOLDED = no atomic grounding at all. LESSON_ATOMS = atoms mentioned elsewhere in lesson but not connected to this concept.
Substance-Model Errors (REI)0
Curriculum treats a process or outcome as a substance - "heat flows," "energy is stored," "electricity flows like water." Student builds a substance ontology.
Label-as-Explanation (LAE)0
Curriculum provides a name and treats it as an explanation - "this happens because of gravity." Student believes knowing the name IS understanding the concept.
Vague-Entity Errors (AEC)0
Curriculum uses vague entities ("tiny particles," "building blocks") without specifying atoms or molecules. Student invents their own model with macroscopic properties.
Factual Science Errors (FSE)0
Statements that are scientifically incorrect - not imprecise framing, but wrong. Any confirmed FSE = Not Recommended.
Practices100% - Deep
Seven practices scored PRESENT, PARTIAL, or ABSENT and averaged: asking questions, developing and using models, planning and carrying out investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, using mathematics, constructing explanations and designing solutions, and argument from evidence. Higher is better, the opposite direction from gap and map errors. Reported but not part of the Foundation Score or the verdict.
Curriculum-Wide Finding

Type 6 Clean-but-Empty under strict atomic-foundation scoring. Cross-grade scope discipline documented: TE defers reflection to Level 4 Module 4 and avoids transparent/translucent/opaque at K-2 with documented pedagogical reasoning. Practices 100% green with sustained 24-lesson anchor model + Science Challenge engineering design + Socratic Seminar at Grade 1.

Bright Spots

Cross-grade scope discipline documented in TE. Sustained 24-lesson anchor model revision. Science Challenge with light-meter quantitative material testing. Cross-cultural framing (Indonesian wayang + Norwegian Rjukan + lighthouse). Socratic Seminar at Grade 1. Practices 100% green.

Depth Classification

Not Recommended (Type 6 Clean-but-Empty - atomic theory absent at K-2) - All 18 mechanism passages UNSCAFFOLDED. L12 SEM microscopy is microscopic-but-not-atomic. PhD Science design philosophy: defer atomic mechanism of light to Grade 4 / higher levels.

Unit note: Scores represent the evaluated unit only. Other units in this program may score differently. The depth label (Shallow) describes this unit's structural relationship to causal mechanism - the detail above explains whether that structure reflects deliberate design, inherited convention, or other factors.

Evidence and data

Evidence for every entry is published at three levels. Each level states what it contains and what it leaves out.

1On this page

Scores, verdict, and the full pattern count for this unit are above: adjusted gap, REI / LAE / AEC counts, FSE status, and the seven-practice score. Passage-level detail for this unit is carried in the downloadable evidence file.

2Download the evidence

This file covers the unit scored on this page.

Excel (.xlsx)CSV14 passages · 10 KB
How these passages were selected. This is a curated subset, not the full evidence table. The selection rule is fixed: 8 to 12 passages chosen to illustrate every pattern the pipeline found in this unit, including the patterns that count in the program's favor. Where a pattern appears many times, one representative instance is included and the full count is reported on this page rather than reproduced in the file. Passages are quoted verbatim and identified by location so any claim can be checked against the source. The full evidence table is not posted publicly because it would reproduce a substantial portion of a copyrighted work; it is available under tier 3 below.
3The full dataset

The complete classified evidence table for this unit, every extracted passage with its classification, is available to researchers, journalists, and to the publisher of the program being scored. This is a standing offer with no conditions attached and no agreement to sign.

If you think a score is wrong, say so. Challenges and our responses to them are published on the evidence and challenges page, including the ones we lose.

← Back to Science Ed Ledger

Request a Review

Have a curriculum, kit, or program you'd like us to review? Drop us a note, tell us what you want to see, we'll test it and post the results.