OpenSciEd Elementary - Grade K, Unit K.1: Why do some surfaces get hot and how can we make them less hot? (Energy: Sunlight)

OpenSciEd · K-5
✕ Not Recommended Shallow by Design

OpenSciEd Elem K.1 (Kindergarten sunlight/surfaces) - sixth K-4 OpenSciEd unit confirming program-wide pattern: 0% Foundation + 92.9% practices. K-4 pattern consistent. Particle-level energy transfer explicitly deferred to middle school. Grade 5 break confirmed structural (NGSS 5-PS1-1 driven).

Foundation Score
0%
Shallow
Gap: 100% · Map errors: 0 (×3 = 0 pts)
What-Why Gap
100%
Full gap - atoms/molecules never introduced before explanations expected
Map Errors
0%
No ontological mismatches detected
Factual Errors
0
No factual errors detected.
Practices
92.9%
Deep
Students engage in genuine scientific practices at a developmentally appropriate level across the unit. Reported, and does not affect the verdict.
Program Information
ProgramOpenSciEd Elementary
UnitGrade K, Unit K.1: Why do some surfaces get hot and how can we make them less hot? (Energy: Sunlight)
PublisherOpenSciEd
AuthorOpenSciEd Curriculum Development Team
Grade BandKindergarten (K-5 calibration applied)
NGSS AlignmentK-PS3-1, K-PS3-2, K-2-ETS1-1

Verdict and Foundation

OpenSciEd Elementary Unit K.1 scores Foundation 0% - at the framework floor, identical to OpenSciEd Units 1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, and 4.2. Zero map errors across 25 student-facing passages. Zero confirmed FSEs. The adjusted gap is 100% - all 9 mechanism passages are UNSCAFFOLDED because the unit contains no atomic, molecular, or particulate content.

Author intent is explicit. About the Science makes SIX distinct deferrals: (1) formal energy definition → Grade 4; (2) "forms of energy" as substance language explicitly avoided; (3) heat processes (conduction/convection/radiation) with explicit mention of particle motion → middle school; (4) color absorption/reflection; (5) quantitative measurement (thermometers); (6) "Earth surfaces" undefined. Every one of these is what an atoms-first or mechanism-first sunlight unit would include.

Practices score 92.9% green - high, matching the K-4 OpenSciEd pattern. OpenSciEd's K-4 pattern is consistent across all six K-4 OpenSciEd Elementary units reviewed (K sunlight, G1 light/shadow, G2 matter/engineering, G3 forces/magnets, G4 energy/collisions, G4 energy/electricity). The Grade 5 break at 5.2 (Foundation 82.4%) is confirmed structural - driven by NGSS 5-PS1-1's mandatory particle introduction at Grade 5.

K.1 connects to 4.2 specifically: the exact same anti-substance "forms of energy" framing appears at both Kindergarten and Grade 4 among OpenSciEd units reviewed - "to discuss heat or light as 'forms of energy' would imply that heat and light exist as distinct entities, but they do not. Energy is energy." OpenSciEd Elementary operates a consistent anti-REI-substance design choice from K onward.

What Students Learn

The unit is organized in two lesson sets across 10 lessons.

Lessons 1-5 (Sun and Surfaces): Students make observations of how schoolyard surfaces feel (L1), investigate the sunny/shady pattern (L2-4), and draw to explain the cause-effect (L5). Central finding: "The sun shines on surfaces in sunny places, which makes them feel hot."

Lessons 6-10 (Engineering Blacktop Solutions): Students reframe the phenomenon as an engineering problem ("the blacktop being uncomfortable when it's hot"), plan designs to block sun (L7), build them (L8), test them (L9), and reach Class Consensus Design (L10).

Central science model: Sunlight shines on surfaces → surfaces feel hot. No sunlight → less hot. Therefore, block the sun with a structure. This is the K-PS3-1/K-PS3-2 NGSS-minimum framing - no deeper.

Key Evidence

"K-PS3-1: Make observations to determine the effect of sunlight on Earth's surface. K-PS3-2: Use tools and materials provided to design and build a structure that will reduce the warming effect of sunlight on an area." (Unit Overview, p. 12)

NGSS K-PS3 PE bundle. Observable cause-effect at K-level only.

"PS3.B Conservation of Energy and Energy Transfer: Sunlight warms Earth's surface." (Unit Overview, p. 13)

Single-sentence DCI element - the unit's entire mechanism story.

"Students do not investigate or attempt to explain this transfer of energy, they only observe its effect. In 4th grade, students will begin to define energy and identify that energy can be transferred via light, heat, sound, electric currents, and changing motion." (About the Science, p. 34)

Explicit deferral. K curriculum knows its own scope; energy definition deferred to Grade 4.

"Note that to discuss heat or light as 'forms of energy' would imply that heat and light (and sound and motion) exist as distinct entities, but they do not. Energy is energy." (About the Science, p. 34)

⭐ Anti-REI-substance framing at K-level - IDENTICAL passage appears in OpenSciEd 4.2. The program operates a consistent design choice from K onward.

"In each of these processes [conduction, convection, radiation], energy transfer causes particles to increase in speed, which we can often detect as an increase in temperature. Students will not describe energy transfer or changes in temperature at a particle level until middle school." (About the Science, p. 34)

⭐ Explicit particle-level deferral. Author voice names the deferred mechanism (particle motion) and excludes it from K-level student content.

"The sun shines on surfaces in sunny places, which makes them feel hot. The sun does not shine on surfaces in shady places, which makes them feel less hot." (Lesson 4)

Central macroscopic explanation. Correct K-level physics.

"We can use materials to make a cover to stop the sun from shining on the blacktop which causes the blacktop to be less hot." (Lesson 10)

Engineering capstone synthesis - K-PS3-2 + K-2-ETS1-1 met.

Practices

Practices: 92.9% (green tier - high, sixth K-4 OpenSciEd unit to match). Six of seven K-level NGSS practices Intentionally Developed; mathematics PARTIAL. Distinctive K-level strengths: (1) Notice and Wonder + Ideas and Wonders charts; (2) drawings as K-level models throughout; (3) full engineering design cycle L6-10 (define-design-build-test-refine-consensus); (4) Class Consensus Design L10; (5) outdoor observations with peer collaboration. Math PARTIAL by explicit author choice ("kindergarteners are still developing their understanding that numbers can be used to represent ideas of more and less"). K-level Intentionally Developed Crosscutting Concepts: Patterns, Cause and Effect.

What Would Change This Verdict

Option A (Rewrite, ~30-50%): Add one teacher's note in L4 or L5: "Sunlight is made of tiny pieces of light called photons. When photons hit a surface, they make the tiny pieces of the surface (atoms) move faster, which is what 'hot' really means."

Option B (Conditional, ~60-70%): Restructure L5's cause-effect drawings to include "tiny pieces of the surface" as the receiver of energy. About the Science already names this as the deferred mechanism.

Option C (Recommended, ~80%+): Anticipate NGSS 5-PS1-1 at K - introduce atoms/particles in surfaces in L2 and explain "hot" as faster atomic motion in L4.

Scoring Detail
Total Passages Scored25
Raw Gap Error100.0% (zero atomic content in unit)
FALSE = atoms/molecules not present before students are asked to explain. The student is navigating without a starting point.
Adjusted Gap Error100.0% (all 9 mechanism passages UNSCAFFOLDED - six explicit deferrals in About the Science)
UNSCAFFOLDED = no atomic grounding at all. LESSON_ATOMS = atoms mentioned elsewhere in lesson but not connected to this concept.
Substance-Model Errors (REI)0
Curriculum treats a process or outcome as a substance - "heat flows," "energy is stored," "electricity flows like water." Student builds a substance ontology.
Label-as-Explanation (LAE)0
Curriculum provides a name and treats it as an explanation - "this happens because of gravity." Student believes knowing the name IS understanding the concept.
Vague-Entity Errors (AEC)0
Curriculum uses vague entities ("tiny particles," "building blocks") without specifying atoms or molecules. Student invents their own model with macroscopic properties.
Factual Science Errors (FSE)0
Statements that are scientifically incorrect - not imprecise framing, but wrong. Any confirmed FSE = Not Recommended.
Practices92.9% - Deep
Seven practices scored PRESENT, PARTIAL, or ABSENT and averaged: asking questions, developing and using models, planning and carrying out investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, using mathematics, constructing explanations and designing solutions, and argument from evidence. Higher is better, the opposite direction from gap and map errors. Reported but not part of the Foundation Score or the verdict.
Curriculum-Wide Finding

OpenSciEd Elementary K.1 is an OpenSciEd unit and another K-4 unit to score 0% Foundation + 92.9% practices. The K-4 pattern is consistent across six K-4 grade levels and topics. The Grade 5 break at 5.2 (Foundation 82.4%) is confirmed structural - driven by NGSS 5-PS1-1's mandatory particle introduction at Grade 5. K.1's anti-REI-substance framing is identical to the same framing in 4.2 - OpenSciEd operates a consistent design choice from K onward.

Bright Spots

K-level inquiry pedagogy. Six Intentionally Developed K-level practices. Full engineering design cycle L6-10 (define-design-build-test-refine-consensus). Class Consensus Design L10. Outdoor observations integrate place-based learning. Patterns and Cause and Effect Intentionally Developed at K-level.

Depth Classification

shallow by design - Zero MISCONCEPTION_BY_DESIGN flags. Sunlight correctly framed as cause, warming as effect. Anti-REI-substance framing explicit ("forms of energy would imply distinct entities - they do not. Energy is energy."). Hot/less hot scale explicitly chosen to avoid the misleading "cold = a thing" framing. Six explicit boundaries (energy definition, forms-of-energy, heat processes, color absorption, thermometers, Earth surfaces) all consistent with NGSS K-2 scope.

Unit note: Scores represent the evaluated unit only. Other units in this program may score differently. The depth label (Shallow) describes this unit's structural relationship to causal mechanism - the detail above explains whether that structure reflects deliberate design, inherited convention, or other factors.

Evidence and data

Evidence for every entry is published at three levels. Each level states what it contains and what it leaves out.

1On this page

Scores, verdict, and the full pattern count for this unit are above: adjusted gap, REI / LAE / AEC counts, FSE status, and the seven-practice score. The analysis quotes 7 passages verbatim from the curriculum.

2Download the evidence

This file covers the unit scored on this page.

Excel (.xlsx)CSV12 passages · 9 KB
How these passages were selected. This is a curated subset, not the full evidence table. The selection rule is fixed: 8 to 12 passages chosen to illustrate every pattern the pipeline found in this unit, including the patterns that count in the program's favor. Where a pattern appears many times, one representative instance is included and the full count is reported on this page rather than reproduced in the file. Passages are quoted verbatim and identified by location so any claim can be checked against the source. The full evidence table is not posted publicly because it would reproduce a substantial portion of a copyrighted work; it is available under tier 3 below.
3The full dataset

The complete classified evidence table for this unit, every extracted passage with its classification, is available to researchers, journalists, and to the publisher of the program being scored. This is a standing offer with no conditions attached and no agreement to sign.

If you think a score is wrong, say so. Challenges and our responses to them are published on the evidence and challenges page, including the ones we lose.

← Back to Science Ed Ledger

Request a Review

Have a curriculum, kit, or program you'd like us to review? Drop us a note, tell us what you want to see, we'll test it and post the results.